Wednesday, 30 December 2009
Improvements
When it came to actually sitting down to edit we found we didn't need to re-shoot the screen as we could instead insert clips of pasty events flowing backwards which looked suprisingly effective when put together with close-ups on Allison's face.
We wanted more feedback before we committed ourselves to a final cut so we went to the other class as they would be watching it the first time and we needed a fresh look at our film. The feedback we got was pretty much all positive with some very minor adjustments mostly to do with sound which i made that evening. The final cut was ready.
Wednesday, 9 December 2009
Feedback from first Viewing
· Narrative issues and confusion through minimal dialogue
· Confusion over identity of Heather
· Why doesn’t Allison pick the papers up if they are so important?
· Screen flickers during the final scene
· Relevance of photograph unclear
· Radio sound bridge short and unclear
· Title slide amateurish and slow
· Volume issues
Although I intend to amend most of these problems I don’t see what I can do about narrative issues, there is reasoning behind Allison leaving the files and the age difference between Allison and Heather but it’s hard to see how we can explain this without shooting the entire film. We only have two minutes after all.
I am keen however to fix sound and editing issues something I believe I should be able to do quite easily. I also plan to film a couple of additional shots of the screen sans flickering and try a different photograph hopefully with a younger Katie in it.
Editing
After a couple of tedious days of converting I was ready to start editing but even then it was put off by James’ availability. Eventually we sat down and edited on Thursday evening, we quickly established a very rough cut which I perfected over several hours that followed including adding music, titles, transitions and the like.
I was happy with what we eventually came up with but there are still a few rough areas, in particular the amateurish title ‘Lab Rats’ which will need a lot more work and we will need to talk about the sound.
Sunday, 29 November 2009
Second Day of Filming
.jpg)
We had originally intended for the second scene to be set in the morning but due to the lighting conditions we changed it to evening and kept our shots lit by artificial light alone. It gave the film a warmer feel which although we didn’t plan for worked surprisingly well. We even managed a focus shift in the shot where Allison puts down her mug and discovers the disc labelled ‘human testing.
The hardest shot to film was where Allison drops her mug of coffee in surprise and it shatters. This was difficult because the only mug we had permission to smash was actually pretty sturdy and it took two goes to get it to break with a lot of mopping up cold coffee in-between. Fortunately I thought to put Clingfilm over the camera lense before we shot this because everything got splattered with cold coffee. The coffee was cold obviously for safety reasons.
Sound
First we captured breathing, this is harder than it sounds because it was hard for Katie to breath naturally under pressure. She proved quite useless at it so myself and James recorded our own versions which we’d try later in editing and use whatever sounded most convincing.
Then we wrote out the voice-over that would be required in the second scene. At this point we would need Katie’s voice to merge into James’ as he would be doing the voice for Daniel Carroll, who was no longer Chinese. We recorded both twice.
Finally we recorded a couple of telephone noises to be put over the final black out, again we would decide in the edit which sounded best.
Re-Scheduling
We can also do any pick-ups for the first scene Tuesday morning at the Priory where the ground will be flatter.
First Day of Production
Thursday 19th November went almost as planned. We all turned up on time at Wareside, found an appropriate field and set to work filming our opening shots, after that things started to drift away from how we might have dared to hope.Our first location for the chase we had hoped to use the tricycle to get some smooth tracking shots of Courtney running but the ground was so rough this proved impossible. We tried different stretches of ground to try somewhere a bit flatter but every time the shots came out shaky and Courtney rarely even appeared in them. To make up for this I had to get lots of excess still shots and even now I will have to review what we have and decide if we need to re-shoot any of it.
Our second location proved more fruitful. We found an excellent tree
for Courtney to hide behind but again we had issues with the sticky muddy ground that prevented Courtney from smoothly sliding behind the tree. Katie, who played Courtney, could scarcely even run down the bank and behind the tree. We had to get lots of quick shots and hope we could edit them together into something vaguely decent. On the plus side the sun was angled in such a way we took the opportunity to get some excellent backlit shots where Katie was practically in silhouette.Still to do though is the entire second scene including a slow-motion shot of a coffee cup falling and pick-ups on this scene.
Animatic
• Most people seem unsure as to why Daniel Yang has to be Chinese, this is something we wanted to keep a mystery to reveal later on but it seems to be causing unnecessary confusion. We have resolved this by re-naming him Daniel Carroll, he will be voiced by James. We have also re-named Courtney Allison.
• Catches audiences attention by not handing them all the information at once.
• Plenty of shots of an appropriate length.
Monday, 16 November 2009
Film Opening Case Study
Saturday, 14 November 2009
Charectoristics of a Film Opening
Plot, Genre and Audience
Our decided genre is thriller since that seems to fit our plot best and holds it’s own basic rules in it’s openings which we hope will guide us into successfully creating ours.
Film openings- clues to genre:
· Music
· Mise-en-scene (particularly costume, props and setting)
· Colour
· Choice of Actors
Final Plot Outline:
After the mysterious disappearance of her adopted father, a Chinese scientist named Daniel Yang, Courtney resolves to search for her father alone ignoring the advice of her peers. She soon finds evidence that Daniel has found a fatal flaw in the medical company’s new miracle drug after they pumped hundreds of thousands of pounds into it. Courtney knows her father hasn’t just gone missing he’s been kidnapped and she has to find him before it’s too late.
Film openings- clues to narrative:
· Introduction of Characters
· Dialogue
· Voice over/Narration
· Captions
· Props
Target Audience:
We aim for a teenage and adult audience possibly more female orientated through the choice of protagonist. One of the primary issues in the film is- Can a teenage girl plausibly track down and save her father? It certainly isn’t for children or families.
Film openings- clues to target audience:
· Colour
· Age of Characters
· Simplicity of Narrative
· Choice of Actors
Tuesday, 10 November 2009
A Basic Concept
Preliminary Exorcise
Preliminary Exorcise
Written Evaluation:
Before we could even begin to think about the main project of a film opening we had to demonstrate we had the essential skills. This meant basic shot framing, match on action and shot reverse shot so a lot depended on our camerawork and editing abilities, sound and mise en scene taking a back seat.
In filming it would be safe to say that camera work is a pretty essential element and I like too think we gave it the attention it deserved. Sure enough the shots were steady in focus, or close enough. Most of the shots were also well framed with exception of perhaps the close ups during the shot reverse shot sequence. Charlotte, our first character, could do with a little more looking room whilst Sarah, our second character, moved forward in her chair thus cutting off the top of her head towards the end of her lines. These however were minor errors, had we noticed them we would have re-shot them at the time but we didn’t and I think we made the best of it in editing. Certainly I would say from height of the camera we got the eye-line match about right, and kept to the 180 degree rule, it was something I paid particular attention to during our shot reverse shot sequence. I don’t think I would change any shots other than the framing on the close-ups, I would however add in one which establishes the relationship of the two characters within the room just after Charlotte’s entrance.
Then we come to the equally important and time consuming process of editing, in this case I think we worked quite efficiently. I would say our match on action does as required, it took several tries not to get a delay on the door opening from the other side but eventually I think I had it cut correctly and without any jump cuts. The shot reverse shot sequence works appropriately for me, I deliberately only shot it from two angles so that we wouldn’t be tempted to cut between different angles in the edit causing confusion rather than keeping it simple and effective. The pacing I’m less sure about, our sequence is actually under the time limit and with more time that could have been changed in the edit by giving the characters a little more breathing room as it were between lines. All in all we kept it simple and effective and I like to think we achieved invisible editing, I wouldn’t change much if I were to edit this again if anything I would maybe leave a bit more pause after a couple of the characters lines.
That leaves sound and mise en scene which took less major roles in this case. The sound is probably the weak point in our final cut but the dialogue is audible and the background sound is limited so it isn’t a disaster by any means. As for mise en scene it did at one point nearly cause continuity error when a friend who came to watch wrote on the white board half way through shooting but James thought to point it out, we rubbed it off and it does not appear in our final piece.
All in all I think the finished product does as was required of it and I’m happy with it. In terms of teamwork myself and James worked surprisingly well together and I will be happy to be working with him on the main project. Our contributions weren’t completely even, I did much more of the editing for example but in the filming certainly they evened out and James put in an equal amount into the planning and if it weren’t for him we wouldn’t have had any actors which for a group of two would have rendered this task impossible.
.bmp)
.bmp)